Nikon Z 70-180mm VS 70-200mm F2.8 Nikon 600 PF f6.3 vs 600 F4 TC vs 400 F2.8 TC Tuesday, 28 November 2023 04:33. $4800 vs $15500 - Is this a fair fight?? The colors on the 70-200 f4 VR are Nikon classic! I'd only get the cheaper 2.8 lenses if you plan to do more portraiture work, where the 2.8 at closer distances will give it a bit more subject separation. The 70-200 f4 though is an amazing all-arounder.
Re: 80-200 f/2.8 AF-D vs. 70-200 f/4 vs. Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 VC In reply to Josh Jones • Oct 5, 2013 Thank you for the reply, there seems to be a lot of love for the 80-200.
What makes the 28-200 really special even vs those other 2 super zooms is the f2.8 wide end and the fact that it's still f4.5 thru around 112mm IIRC. It's like having a fast-ish standard zoom with a solid variable tele on top of it, all in a relatively small and sub-600g package.

The one I am interested EF 70-200L/4.0 IS II vs 70-200 GM @200mm/F4.0 in TDP test. 70-200 GM is known has copy variation, and I am not a big fan of studio test in close distance on resolution chart but prefer outdoor test from distance to be more resemble in real-world usage. So just for reference.

Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM vs. Sony FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS vs. Nikon Z 70-200 F2.8 VR. Side by side. 3 lenses compared. 70–200 mm. 70–200 mm. 70–200 mm B1Pet.
  • 55hml9mxjn.pages.dev/85
  • 55hml9mxjn.pages.dev/378
  • 55hml9mxjn.pages.dev/101
  • 55hml9mxjn.pages.dev/327
  • 55hml9mxjn.pages.dev/240
  • 55hml9mxjn.pages.dev/238
  • 55hml9mxjn.pages.dev/197
  • 55hml9mxjn.pages.dev/464

    • nikon 70 200 f4 vs f2 8